The Broker

Image by Frits Ahlefeldt-Laurvig.

Let's ride the wave of sustainism

Michiel Schwarz | 10 October 2011

Nothing less than a radical change in economic thinking is needed in our quest for an “inclusive and sustainable economics”. In fact, what is rightly called for is a paradigm shift indeed. But not just in economic terms. “Sustainism”—as Joost Elffers and I have termed it in our Sustainist Manifesto that was published in New York earlier this year [i]—captures the new paradigm. It’s the name of the emerging culture of the 21st century. Whilst sustainism has some of its roots in the sustainability movement, it goes well beyond purely ecological concerns: it is where connectivity, localism, globalization and sustainability interact. Sustainist culture, as successor to last century’s modernism, will come to shape our collective perceptions of wellbeing and how we wish to design our living environment.

Economics is part of culture, not the other way around. Those concerned with growth and sustainable economic models often loose sight of the fact that wellbeing, and indeed economics, ultimately depends on what people and societies value, what they see as desirable, and how they perceive the future. In other words: culture. What is needed is a reassessment of the cultural framework in which issues of economics and growth are being cast. The fact that such a “cultural shift” in perspective is already underway is a hopeful development. It is present in what Paul Hawken calls “the largest movement in the world”—the one million plus non-profit groups involved in ecological issues, social justice and sustainable development. If sustainability is the movement, sustainism is the culture that will make it possible.

Values are at the core of any culture. Today, new values are emerging. Concepts such as time, information, community, and creativity are becoming valued resources, socially as well as economically (as Juliet Schor has argued eloquently in her book Plenitudes). Meanwhile, we see a new set of “sustainist qualities” that is arising, such as sharing, being connected, place-based experiences, ecologically and socially responsible living, and human scale in development. In the next decades—I contend—sustainism will become the new operating context for redefining our economic models and our strategies for change.

The rise of “ethonomics” has been one way to signify the shift in economic orientation in sustainist culture. We’re just beginning to reimagine what an economics of sharing, connecting, collaboration and openness could look like. An ethical economics, based on—yet to be operationalized—sustainist values should be placed at the center of the debate. Seen through the “lens” of sustainism, our need to incorporate new values and qualities into our models is being exposed. At the heart of a “sustainist economics” should be concerns such as eco-equity, social and ecological responsibility, commons thinking, open exchange, inclusive design, appropriate scale, and local meanings. Let’s ride the cultural wave of sustainism, as we refocus our agendas and our strategies.

[i] Schwarz, Michiel, and Joost Elffers. (2011). Sustainism Is the New Modernism: A Cultural Manifesto for the Sustainist Era. New York: DAP Distributed Art Publishers: www.sustainism.com.

Photo credit main picture: Image by Frits Ahlefeldt-Laurvig.

Comments

Your comment will not be automatically posted but first reviewed by the editor. If the editor has questions with respect to the content of your comment, you will be contacted.

 

Still far from a shared Utopia

I like the idea of sustainism and hope the story of the world will play out this way. Yet, the idealistic and utopian (in this sense ironically quite similar to the modernist view of the early 20th century) view being expressed here does not do justice to the heterogenity of the world.
It needs to be remembered that ideals of eco-equity and sharing continue to be the property of elite leftist thinkers, mostly based in Western countries. In this regard we have to be beware of the hijacking of social movements in the global South by these Western intellectuals. Think for example of the Chipko movement, celebrated as a eco-feminist movement. But on the ground a struggle for livelihood that was not so much about empowering women, but about preserving tradition. Very different ideals and values than those described by Schwarz form the foundation of such movements.
In addition, movement towards an opposite direction can be detected as well. Here, one can think of the Palestine-Israeli conflict that is by no means based on mutual respect or sharing. Modernist and pre-modernist assets such as nationalism and religion play still play a major role on the world’s stage.
Josephine Maasland | October 18, 2011 | Respond

Sustainism is Postmodernist by nature

Josephine, I disagree. If anything, Sustainism is a postmodernist concept and the whole point is, this Sustainist era will rise despite these previous barriers. Sustainism doesn't belong to the West or is something created by elite leftist philosophers; its a culture that is manifesting regardless of faith and affiliations and should be able to transcend these boundaries. However, as a form of postmodernism, I believe that Sustainism is neither an an absolute truth for those very same reasons you mentioned nor does it seek to be because it doesn't solve all issues in essence. It is just another layer of living, but not a replacement of other beliefs and cultures; people will still pick up guns and rockets to kill each other over holy land, then, buy an iPhone for their kid for Christmas while benefiting from feed-in tariffs simultaneously in their carbon neutral, solar-powered, permacultured home. Dr. Schwartz concedes in his book that "no viewpoint is all-encompassing." That is postmodernism by definition.
Clodomir Jean-Louis | November 28, 2011 |